>>March 2, 2001

Cats can't cajole Mackowiak

frontnewsartssportsopinioncampus calendarletters to the editorarchives

As a writer for the school newspaper, I feel as though I have the power to make a difference.
Being somewhat in the public eye, I can, through my words, influence ideas and inspire action.


I usually end up using this power to get a lot of people pissed off at me, and today should be no exception. Why break tradition, right?


Life is full of decisions. There are some questions that come with one hugely dominant answer that everybody reverts to, such as, "Do you know why I pulled you over?" or, "Does this dress make me look fat?" (The answer to both is, "I'm sorry, what?")


There are also others that come with a myriad of choices, such as what type of music to listen to, or what one's favorite color is, or which Superbowl was the best.


What's boring about this type of question is that there's no right or wrong answer.


Who's to say that ranch dressing is better than Italian, or 1000 Island, or bleu cheese? I can almost guarantee that there's never been a food fight started because one person found another's taste in salad dressing different from his own.


The only possible exception would be if that person had asked for honey mustard.


Honey mustard dressing arrives at the table looking as if the waiter had just removed several nauseous puppies from the plate.


My favorite topics are those that leave the person with only two choices to select from.


When faced with such a question, a person must weigh his/her options carefully, choose one or the other, and then stick with it.


The fun part about this is, in choosing one, he/she presumes that the other is wrong, and, therefore, anybody who chooses the other is also wrong.


This can result in a lot of arguing and flared tempers. I'm convinced that the Cold War is a result of having both Coke and Pepsi distributors at the United Nation's Building.


This moves us into today's topic: Cats or dogs? There you go; fight amongst yourselves. I'm going to start the battle by scoring a few points for the dog lovers out there.


Instead of explaining why dogs are superior, I'm going to take a few stabs at felines, and those who prefer them.


You can always tell when a person lives with a cat. You don't even have to visit their home. Cat owners are often big into recycling, which is evident in the permanent coat of discarded cat hair they wear.
They're also good at sharing. This coat can then be instantaneously transferred to anybody within 60 feet, and it's most common at lunchtime.


Another very effective method of detecting a cat lover is by simply having a phone conversation with him/her.


A cat feels threatened by the telephone because it diverts the owner's attention away from him. Not that the cat wants your attention anyway, but he sure can't snub you if you're on the phone.


So to hear something like this is quite common: "So we got a hold of Ted's gym shorts, and we hung 'em on the flagpole, and AAAAHHHH!! Son of a-! Marie! Get this OOW! Get this thing off my neck before I bleed to death!!"


Probably the most blatant evidence of a feline presence is an innumerable amount of fresh, painfully deep scratches on a person.


These are often sustained while attempting to pet a cat. Petting a cat is a very dangerous move; house cats are the number one killers of people with an IQ between 35-40.


If you know someone who has been hanging out with cats quite a bit, don't wait until it's too late. Be a friend; act now, get this person help.


Well, I hope I've accomplished my goal. I suspect that in the next few days, several hair-covered hospital patients being treated for minor flesh wounds will approach me and try to convince me that cats are the better pet to have.


If you really want to have this conversation with me, give me a call. I prefer to do it over the phone.

 
news | opinion | arts | sports&leisure contact us | ui | front | archives